Rakuten Securities Australia vs Saxo: licences compared
Side-by-side view of each broker's licences, regulator tiers and key facts. Remember that protection depends on which entity holds your account.
| Attribute | Rakuten Securities Australia | Saxo |
|---|---|---|
| Licence Score | 56Moderate | 84Very strong |
| Strongest licence | 1 Tier 1 | 1 Tier 1 |
| Licences on record | 1 | 8 |
| 1 FCA United Kingdom | — | Licensed |
| 1 ASIC Australia | Licensed | Licensed |
| 1 JFSA Japan | — | Licensed |
| 1 MAS Singapore | — | Licensed |
| 1 FINMA Switzerland | — | Licensed |
| 1 SFC Hong Kong | — | Licensed |
| 2 AFM Netherlands | — | Licensed |
| 2 Finanstilsynet (DK) Denmark | — | Licensed |
| Founded | 2014 | 1992 |
| Headquarters | Australia | Denmark |
| Type | Forex & CFD broker | Trading bank |
| Publicly listed | No | No |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5 | Proprietary |
| Minimum deposit | No minimum | No minimum |
| Visit | Visit site | Visit site |
Frequently asked questions
Is Rakuten Securities Australia or Saxo better regulated?
Saxo has the higher Licence Score (84 vs 56), based on the number and tier of licences, operating history and public listing.
Which regulators license both Rakuten Securities Australia and Saxo?
Both are matched to licences from ASIC.