IG vs Interactive Brokers: licences compared

Side-by-side view of each broker's licences, regulator tiers and key facts. Remember that protection depends on which entity holds your account.

AttributeIGInteractive Brokers
Licence Score93Very strong83Very strong
Strongest licence 1 Tier 1 1 Tier 1
Licences on record118
1 FCA United Kingdom Licensed · FRN 195355Licensed
1 ASIC Australia LicensedLicensed
1 JFSA Japan LicensedLicensed
1 CFTC / NFA United States LicensedLicensed
1 MAS Singapore LicensedLicensed
1 BaFin Germany Licensed—
1 CIRO Canada —Licensed
1 FINMA Switzerland Licensed—
1 SFC Hong Kong —Licensed
1 CBI Ireland —Licensed
2 FSCA South Africa Licensed · FSP 41393—
2 DFSA United Arab Emirates Licensed—
2 FMA (NZ) New Zealand Licensed—
3 BMA Bermuda Licensed—
Founded19741978
HeadquartersUnited KingdomUnited States
TypeSpread betting & CFD providerMulti-asset broker
Publicly listedLSE:IGGNASDAQ:IBKR
PlatformsProprietary, MT4, ProRealTime, TradingViewProprietary
Minimum depositNo minimumNo minimum
VisitVisit siteVisit site

Frequently asked questions

Is IG or Interactive Brokers better regulated?

IG has the higher Licence Score (93 vs 83), based on the number and tier of licences, operating history and public listing.

Which regulators license both IG and Interactive Brokers?

Both are matched to licences from ASIC, CFTC / NFA, FCA, JFSA and MAS.

Risk warning: CFDs and leveraged forex are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Most retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Consider whether you understand how they work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. Read more.