OANDA vs Trading 212: licences compared
Side-by-side view of each broker's licences, regulator tiers and key facts. Remember that protection depends on which entity holds your account.
| Attribute | OANDA | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Licence Score | 82Very strong | 72Strong |
| Strongest licence | 1 Tier 1 | 1 Tier 1 |
| Licences on record | 8 | 4 |
| 1 FCA United Kingdom | Licensed | Licensed |
| 1 ASIC Australia | Licensed | Licensed |
| 1 JFSA Japan | Licensed | — |
| 1 CFTC / NFA United States | Licensed | — |
| 1 MAS Singapore | Licensed | — |
| 1 CIRO Canada | Licensed | — |
| 2 CySEC Cyprus | — | Licensed |
| 2 MFSA Malta | Licensed | — |
| 2 FSC (BG) Bulgaria | — | Licensed |
| 4 BVI FSC British Virgin Islands | Licensed | — |
| Founded | 1996 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | United States | United Kingdom |
| Type | Forex & CFD broker | Multi-asset broker |
| Publicly listed | No | No |
| Platforms | Proprietary, MT4, MT5, TradingView | Proprietary |
| Minimum deposit | No minimum | US$1 |
| Visit | Visit site | Visit site |
Frequently asked questions
Is OANDA or Trading 212 better regulated?
OANDA has the higher Licence Score (82 vs 72), based on the number and tier of licences, operating history and public listing.
Which regulators license both OANDA and Trading 212?
Both are matched to licences from ASIC and FCA.