FXCM vs Pepperstone: licences compared

Side-by-side view of each broker's licences, regulator tiers and key facts. Remember that protection depends on which entity holds your account.

AttributeFXCMPepperstone
Licence Score72Strong78Strong
Strongest licence 1 Tier 1 1 Tier 1
Licences on record47
1 FCA United Kingdom Licensed · FRN 217689Licensed · FRN 684312
1 ASIC Australia LicensedLicensed · AFSL 414530
1 BaFin Germany —Licensed
2 CySEC Cyprus LicensedLicensed · Licence 388/20
2 FSCA South Africa Licensed—
2 DFSA United Arab Emirates —Licensed
3 CMA (Kenya) Kenya —Licensed
3 SCB Bahamas —Licensed
Founded19992010
HeadquartersUnited KingdomAustralia
TypeForex & CFD brokerForex & CFD broker
Publicly listedNoNo
PlatformsProprietary, MT4, TradingViewMT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView
Minimum depositUS$50No minimum
VisitVisit siteVisit site

Frequently asked questions

Is FXCM or Pepperstone better regulated?

Pepperstone has the higher Licence Score (78 vs 72), based on the number and tier of licences, operating history and public listing.

Which regulators license both FXCM and Pepperstone?

Both are matched to licences from ASIC, FCA and CySEC.

Risk warning: CFDs and leveraged forex are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Most retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Consider whether you understand how they work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. Read more.