EC Markets vs Trading 212: licences compared
Side-by-side view of each broker's licences, regulator tiers and key facts. Remember that protection depends on which entity holds your account.
| Attribute | EC Markets | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Licence Score | 69Strong | 72Strong |
| Strongest licence | 1 Tier 1 | 1 Tier 1 |
| Licences on record | 4 | 4 |
| 1 FCA United Kingdom | Licensed | Licensed |
| 1 ASIC Australia | Licensed | Licensed |
| 2 CySEC Cyprus | — | Licensed |
| 2 FSCA South Africa | Licensed | — |
| 2 FMA (NZ) New Zealand | Licensed | — |
| 2 FSC (BG) Bulgaria | — | Licensed |
| Founded | 2011 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | United Kingdom | United Kingdom |
| Type | Forex & CFD broker | Multi-asset broker |
| Publicly listed | No | No |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5 | Proprietary |
| Minimum deposit | — | US$1 |
| Visit | Visit site | Visit site |
Frequently asked questions
Is EC Markets or Trading 212 better regulated?
Trading 212 has the higher Licence Score (72 vs 69), based on the number and tier of licences, operating history and public listing.
Which regulators license both EC Markets and Trading 212?
Both are matched to licences from ASIC and FCA.