Admirals vs Interactive Brokers: licences compared

Side-by-side view of each broker's licences, regulator tiers and key facts. Remember that protection depends on which entity holds your account.

AttributeAdmiralsInteractive Brokers
Licence Score78Strong83Very strong
Strongest licence 1 Tier 1 1 Tier 1
Licences on record88
1 FCA United Kingdom LicensedLicensed
1 ASIC Australia LicensedLicensed
1 JFSA Japan —Licensed
1 CFTC / NFA United States —Licensed
1 MAS Singapore —Licensed
1 CIRO Canada —Licensed
1 SFC Hong Kong —Licensed
1 CBI Ireland —Licensed
2 CySEC Cyprus Licensed—
2 FSCA South Africa Licensed—
2 EFSA Estonia Licensed—
3 CMA (Kenya) Kenya Licensed—
3 JSC Jordan Licensed—
4 FSA (Seychelles) Seychelles Licensed—
Founded20011978
HeadquartersEstoniaUnited States
TypeForex & CFD brokerMulti-asset broker
Publicly listedNoNASDAQ:IBKR
PlatformsMT4, MT5Proprietary
Minimum depositUS$100No minimum
VisitVisit siteVisit site

Frequently asked questions

Is Admirals or Interactive Brokers better regulated?

Interactive Brokers has the higher Licence Score (83 vs 78), based on the number and tier of licences, operating history and public listing.

Which regulators license both Admirals and Interactive Brokers?

Both are matched to licences from ASIC and FCA.

Risk warning: CFDs and leveraged forex are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Most retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Consider whether you understand how they work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. Read more.